Allen and Heath Sq5 roundup
Allen and Heath Sq5: A Complete Buyer's Guide
How the SQ-5 compares against the Yamaha QL1 and Midas M32, and what to buy when you've made your decision.
Choosing between digital consoles at the mid-professional level involves more than specification comparison. The Allen and Heath SQ5 sits in a competitive field against the Yamaha QL series, DiGiCo SD9 and Midas M32, and understanding where each sits in terms of workflow, expansion and value helps you make the right decision for your application rather than just the best number on paper.
The Case For the SQ-5
The SQ-5's primary strengths are its 96kHz processing architecture, its logical routing structure and its excellent expansion ecosystem. Running the console at 96kHz rather than the more common 48kHz provides genuine headroom and clarity benefits that are audible on close comparison, particularly on transient-heavy material like live drums and horns. The processing architecture — 160 inputs to 64 destinations — is generous for the price point and handles complex routing scenarios without compromise.
Allen & Heath's SLink and XCVI stagebox range is comprehensive and well-priced. The DX168 stagebox (16 in, 8 out over Cat5e) and ME-500 personal monitor system integrate tightly with the SQ workflow. This ecosystem gives the Allen and Heath SQ5 a genuine advantage over competitors whose equivalent expansion costs significantly more.
How It Compares to the Yamaha QL1
The Yamaha QL1 is the most frequently cited alternative. It runs at 96kHz, has strong Dante integration as standard and benefits from Yamaha's large installed user base. The QL1 is more expensive than the SQ-5 at street price and has slightly fewer simultaneous input channels. The Yamaha workflow is well-established and many touring engineers prefer it for its familiarity. The SQ-5 offers better value per channel and a more flexible expansion model; the QL1 offers more established Dante support and a larger global service network.
How It Compares to the Midas M32
The Midas M32 is the dominant console in its price bracket partly because of its familiarity — the interface is widely known and there is an enormous pool of engineers comfortable with it. It runs at 96kHz and supports Behringer's P16 monitor system. The M32 has a larger fader footprint (32 faders vs 25) and a more established rental stock. The SQ-5 produces better audio quality at equivalent gain settings in direct comparison and offers more routing flexibility; the M32 wins on fader access and the sheer scale of its user community.
Budget and Value Considerations
The SQ-5 sits at a price point that represents strong value when the full feature set is considered: 48-channel processing at 96kHz, built-in FX, comprehensive dynamics on every channel and bus, USB multitrack recording and the expansion ecosystem. A Yamaha QL1 or DiGiCo SD9 with equivalent capability costs considerably more. If your application is mid-size live events, houses of worship or medium-scale touring, the Allen and Heath SQ5 often represents the most capable option at its price.
What to Buy With It
For most touring and venue applications, pairing the console with an Allen & Heath DX168 stagebox covers the majority of input requirements. A decent Cat5e or Cat6 cable run between stage and FOH is essential — invest in quality cable; connection problems in this section cause significant troubleshooting overhead. The SQ-MixPad app runs on any recent iPad, and a dedicated iPad stand for the desk is a practical addition. A flight case specific to the SQ-5 format is worth the investment if the desk will be transported regularly.
For setup guidance and workflow tips, see our beginner's guide. For a full overview of the console's capabilities, see our complete overview.
Comments